Original Papers
Vol. 15 No. 2 (2026)
Ensemble Space Inversion yields efficient and realistic calibration of a multi-layer volcanic aquifer model
Publisher's note
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
All claims expressed in this article are solely those of the authors and do not necessarily represent those of their affiliated organizations, or those of the publisher, the editors and the reviewers. Any product that may be evaluated in this article or claim that may be made by its manufacturer is not guaranteed or endorsed by the publisher.
Published: 30 June 2026
0
Views
0
Downloads
Authors
Calibration (history matching) of groundwater flow and transport models is an essential step to minimize posterior predicting uncertainty, enabling their use to design interventions such as remediation systems in contaminated sites. To encapsulate all information coming from field observations, especially in complex hydrogeological settings, high-dimensional inverse problems are usually set up, which may be difficult or very lengthy to solve. This study applies the Ensemble Space Inversion (ENSI) method to a multi-layer groundwater flow model developed using MODFLOW-USG to design a hydraulic barrier in an industrial area in Central Italy. ENSI projects the inversion problem into a reduced-dimensional parameter space using super-parameters derived from stochastic realizations. The method yields a fast solution that preserves geological plausibility where standard history-matching tools fail to even reach convergence. Results show excellent agreement between observed and simulated heads and drawdowns, with significant computational savings compared to traditional approaches. ENSI proves to be a robust and practical tool for complex hydrogeological models, especially in data-rich and highly heterogeneous settings.
Downloads
Download data is not yet available.
Citations
Anderson, M. P., Woessner, W. W., & Hunt, R. J. (2015). Applied Groundwater Modeling: Simulation of Flow and Advective Transport (2nd ed.). Elsevier / Academic Press. ISBN 978 0 12 058103 0
Carrera, J., Alcolea, A., Medina, A., Hidalgo, J., & Slooten, L. J. (2005). Inverse problem in hydrogeology. Hydrogeology Journal, 13(1), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0404-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10040-004-0404-7
Chen, Y., & Oliver, D. S. (2013). Levenberg–Marquardt forms of the iterative ensemble smoother for efficient history matching and uncertainty quantification. Computational Geosciences, 17, 689–703. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-013-9351-z DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-013-9351-5
Civita, M., & De Maio, M. (2000). Vulnerability assessment of hydrogeological systems. Pitagora Editrice, Bologna.
Delottier, H., Doherty, J., & Brunner, P. (2023). Data space inversion for efficient uncertainty quantification using an integrated surface and sub-surface hydrologic model. Geoscientific Model Development, 16(14), 4213–4231. https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4213-2023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5194/gmd-16-4213-2023
Doherty, J. (2003). Groundwater model calibration using pilot points and regularization. Ground Water, 41(2), 170–177. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2003.tb02580.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2003.tb02580.x
Doherty, J. (2021). ENSI: Ensemble-Space Inversion for Efficient Calibration of Highly Parameterized Models. Watermark Numerical Computing
Doherty, J. (2024). PEST_HP: PEST for highly-parallelized computing environments. Brisbane, Australia: Watermark Numerical Computing. Available online at: https:// www.pesthomepage.org
Doherty, J. (2025). Calibration and uncertainty analysis for complex environmental models. Watermark Numerical Computing, Brisbane
Doherty, J., & Hunt, R. J. (2010). Approaches to Highly Parameterized Inversion: A Guide to Using PEST for Groundwater-Model Calibration. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2010-5169. DOI: 10.3133/sir20105169 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20105169
Fienen, M. N., Muffels, C. T., & Hunt, R. J. (2009). On constraining pilot point calibration with regularization in PEST. Ground Water, 47(6), 835–844. DOI: 10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00635.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2009.00579.x
Hayley, K., Valenza, A., White, E., Hutchison, B., & Schumacher, J. (2019). Application of the Iterative Ensemble Smoother Method and Cloud Computing: A Groundwater Modeling Case Study. Water, 11(8), 1649. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081649 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/w11081649
Kitlasten, W., Moore, C., & Doherty, J. (2025). Exploring the use of new data assimilation technologies to map groundwater quality vulnerability in a large alluvial aquifer. Front. Earth Sci. 13:1609778. doi: 10.3389/feart.2025.160977 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/feart.2025.1609778
Lima, M. M., Emerick, A. A., & Ortiz, C. E. P. (2020). Data-space inversion with ensemble smoother. Comput. Geosci., 24, 1179–1200. doi:10.1007/s10596- 020-09933-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10596-020-09933-w
Liu, D., Rao, X., Zhao, H., Xu, Y.-F., & Gong, R.-X. (2021). An improved data space inversion method to predict reservoir state fields via observed production data. Petroleum Sci. 18, 1127–1142. doi:10.1016/j.petsci.2021.07.008 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.petsci.2021.07.008
Mariethoz, G., Renard, P., & Straubhaar, J. (2010). The Direct Sampling method to perform multiple‑point geostatistical simulations. Water Resources Research, 46(11), W11536. https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2008WR007621
Moore, C., & Doherty, J.E., 2006. The cost of uniqueness in groundwater model calibration. Adv. Water Resour. 29, 605–623. doi: 10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.07.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.07.003
Panday, S., Langevin, C. D., Niswonger, R. G., Ibaraki, M., & Hughes, J. D. (2013). MODFLOW–USG Version 1: An unstructured grid version of MODFLOW for simulating groundwater flow. US Geological Survey Techniques and Methods 6–A45 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3133/tm6A45
Sun, W., & Durlofsky, L. J. (2017). A new data‑space inversion procedure for efficient uncertainty quantification in subsurface flow problems. Mathematical Geosciences, 49(6), 679–715 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11004-016-9672-8
Thornthwaite, C. W. (1948). An approach toward a rational classification of climate. Geographical Review, 38(1), 55–94. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/210739
Tonkin, M. J., & Doherty, J. (2009). Calibration-constrained Monte Carlo analysis of highly parameterized models using subspace techniques. Water Resources Research, 45(12), W00B10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006678 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006678
Tonkin, M.J., & Doherty, J. (2005). A hybrid regularized inversion methodology for highly parameterized environmental models. Water Resources Research, 41, W10412 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR003995
White, J. T. (2018). A model-independent iterative ensemble smoother for efficient history-matching and uncertainty quantification in very high dimensions. Environmental Modelling and Software, 109, 191–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.06.009 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2018.06.009
How to Cite
Ensemble Space Inversion yields efficient and realistic calibration of a multi-layer volcanic aquifer model. (2026). Acque Sotterranee - Italian Journal of Groundwater, 15(2). https://doi.org/10.7343/as-2026-959
Copyright (c) 2026 the Author(s)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
